Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search), a decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
05 1 » 0 1 (Expand Search), 5 1 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search), a decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
05 1 » 0 1 (Expand Search), 5 1 (Expand Search), 01 1 (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Rdh10a deficient embryos have decreased expression of RA signaling responsive genes.
Published 2015“…<p>(A-F) ISH for <i>cyp26a1</i>, <i>hoxb5b</i>, <i>and dhrs3a</i> expression in control sibling and Rdh10a deficient embryos. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
Fluorescence rise response of inverse-pericam and IP2.0 to a stepped decrease in Ca2+
Published 2018“…This is the data of fluorescence rise response of inverse-pericam and IP2.0 to a stepped decrease in Ca<sup>2+</sup>, which was used in the study Hara-Kuge et al.(2018).…”
-
7
Decreased oscillatory flow decreases <i>klf2a</i> expression.
Published 2009“…(L) Quantitative RT-PCR showing the expression level of several flow-responsive genes after lidocaine treatment. <i>klf2a</i> expression is significantly decreased after 6 and 10 h of treatment and is restored by incubation at 34°C; 100% of expression corresponds to a normal expression level. …”
-
8
-
9
Absence of caveolin-1 decreases KCa2.3 endocytosis.
Published 2013“…</b> Knockout of caveolin-1 (Cav-1(−/−)) resulted in a significant decrease of KCa2.3 endocytosis, relative to WT MEFs (n = 3; *p<0.05). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Persistent decrease in dendritic excitability following paired stimulation.
Published 2014“…The excitability was measured by applying depolarizing current pulses (2 s in duration) in 0.1-nA increments. For each depolarizing step, the number of evoked action potentials was counted and plotted against injected current amplitude. …”
-
19
-
20
Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.
Published 2025“…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”