Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
mg decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
1 mg » 5 mg (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
mg decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
1 mg » 5 mg (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Changes in baseline CD4 count through week 12 and week 24 according to the linear regression model.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…Participants were randomly assigned to receive an infusion of either s-ketamine (0.3 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), midazolam (0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), or saline in a blinded fashion. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
The injectable contraceptives depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone enanthate substantially and differentially decrease testosterone and sex hormone binding globulin...
Published 2025“…Both contraceptives substantially decreased, from D0 to 25W, the total testosterone [DMPA-IM D0 0.560, 25W 0.423 nmol/L, -24.3% (p < 0.0001); NET-EN D0 0.551, 25W 0.253 nmol/L, -54.1%, (p < 0.0001)], SHBG [DMPA-IM D0 45.0, 25W 32.7 nmol/L, -29.8% (p < 0.0001); NET-EN D0 50.2, 25W 17.6 nmol/L, -65.1% (p < 0.0001)], and calculated free testosterone levels [DMPA-IM D0 6.87, 25W 5.38 pmol/L, -17.2% (p = 0.0371); NET-EN D0 6.00, 25W 3.70, -40.0% (p < 0.0001)]. …”
-
12
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…Diuron exhibits higher phytotoxicity in sand compared to loamy sand, with ED<sub>50</sub> values (which is the dose at which diuron causes a 50% decrease in plant growth) of 0.03 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 0.07 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> for canola shoot biomass inhibition and 0.01 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 0.06 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> for root dry weight reduction, respectively. …”
-
13
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
14
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
15
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
16
-
17
A Locally Linear Dynamic Strategy for Manifold Learning.
Published 2025“…At 50% noise, <i>R</i> increases, marking a regime not well captured by local linearization. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20