Search alternatives:
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
e fold » 5 fold (Expand Search), _ fold (Expand Search), 2 fold (Expand Search)
10 nm » 100 nm (Expand Search), 10 mm (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
e fold » 5 fold (Expand Search), _ fold (Expand Search), 2 fold (Expand Search)
10 nm » 100 nm (Expand Search), 10 mm (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.
Published 2023“…<p>Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.…”
-
3
-
4
Clinical characteristics of patients in the increased-, stable-, and decreased-RPR groups.
Published 2023Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Net work vs phase of activation and lattice spacing. Top) We simulated work loops in the half sarcomere model at phases of activation of 0 to 0.95 in 0.05 increments, as well as over lattice spacings from 12 to 18 nm and plotted the new work for each condition. Bottom) We then simulated work loops over the same range, but with the stiffness of either the linear or torsional spring comprising the crossbridge head increased or decreased by 50% separately....
Published 2025“…Bottom) We then simulated work loops over the same range, but with the stiffness of either the linear or torsional spring comprising the crossbridge head increased or decreased by 50% separately. …”