Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ largest » _ large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ largest » _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U87MG colonies was observed with 70ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Downregulation of <i>TcPiezo1</i> expression decreases Ca<sup>2+</sup> entry in <i>T. cruzi.</i>
Published 2025“…In panels A-D, addition of buffer A with glucose (BAG), instead of 1.8 mM Ca<sup>2+</sup>, was used as a control baseline labeled with B. Values are means ± s.d. (n = 3). One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons (*<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001).…”