Search alternatives:
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search), ash decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search), ash decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
-
4
-
5
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes + : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Colon tissue and organoid AJC protein expression is decreased with LD shifting in Per2::Luc mice.
Published 2021“…<b>(D)</b> Immunofluorescent staining of cytoskeleton protein Krt-20 (green) in the colon tissue and organoids of shifted and non-shifted Per2::Luc mice. Both tissue and the organoids demonstrated a significant decrease in Krt-20 after shifting (p = 0.0086, 0.020). …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
E<sub>50</sub> values.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
12
HFD induces LDs and decreases ER and mitochondria in nephrocytes.
Published 2021“…<b><a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001230#pbio.3001230.s007" target="_blank">S2 Data</a></b> provides the source data used for all graphs and statistical analyses. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
E<sub>50</sub> values of angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
16
Curve fitting of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17
Fitting curves of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
18
E<sub>50</sub> values of size.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
19
E<sub>50</sub> fluctuation coefficient.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
20
Fitting relationship of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”