Search alternatives:
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 sizes » _ sizes (Expand Search)
5 nn » 5 non (Expand Search), 59 nn (Expand Search), 5 nm (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 sizes » _ sizes (Expand Search)
5 nn » 5 non (Expand Search), 59 nn (Expand Search), 5 nm (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…Data pooled from N = 9 simulations, each corresponding to behavioral data from a different mouse. (B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
6
-
7
Alternative bounded and monotonically decreasing functions do not accurately fit the bias in the naïve SI.
Published 2022“…<p>(A-D) Fitting the naïve SI (blue) of simulated data using different types of bounded and monotonically decreasing functions with three free parameters. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20