Showing 41 - 60 results of 146,426 for search '(((( 5 ng decrease ) OR ( 5 ((a decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))) OR ( 10 a decrease ))', query time: 1.34s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42
  3. 43
  4. 44
  5. 45
  6. 46

    Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity. by Ghattas Bisharat (20706928)

    Published 2025
    “…(d) Noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PV cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 31 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 49.6, <i>p</i> = 2.6 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.02, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), F = 56.5, <i>p</i> = 8.8 × 10<sup>−14</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 3.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup>). …”
  7. 47
  8. 48
  9. 49

    Development of a CRISPR/Cas-Based Detection Platform for Tracking Decreased Susceptibility to Cephalosporins in Neisseria gonorrheae by Ziyuan Zhao (2889005)

    Published 2025
    “…For predicting decreased-susceptibility strains with A501 mutations, MIRCA achieved 98.33% agreement with Sanger sequencing. …”
  10. 50
  11. 51
  12. 52

    Does Mean Platelet Volume Decrease in the presence of Coronary Artery Fistula? by Isa Sincer (7234577)

    Published 2019
    “…Compared to the control group, median (IQR) High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels were significantly higher (p=0.04) and MPV levels were significantly lower in the CAF group (8.84 ± 1.71fL vs. 10.43 ± 1.34, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only MPV was a significant predictor of CAF (p < 0.001, 95% CI for OR: 0.438 (0.306-0.629). …”
  13. 53

    NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission. by Jinwei Zhang (462455)

    Published 2025
    “…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P <  0.001). …”
  14. 54
  15. 55
  16. 56
  17. 57
  18. 58
  19. 59
  20. 60