Showing 221 - 240 results of 66,108 for search '(((( 5 non decrease ) OR ( e point decrease ))) OR ( 5 ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.04s Refine Results
  1. 221
  2. 222
  3. 223
  4. 224
  5. 225
  6. 226
  7. 227
  8. 228

    Average radiant efficiency (± SEM) in equally sized regions of interest (ROIs) of the non-pregnant uterus. by Kalman F. Szucs (19353218)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>A significant decrease in αvβ3 integrin was observed in the PET imaging procedure. (***: p < 0.001).…”
  9. 229
  10. 230
  11. 231
  12. 232

    Risk assessment for hospital admission in patients with COPD; a multi-centre UK prospective observational study by Jilles M. Fermont (3746068)

    Published 2020
    “…In total, 291 of 714 individuals experienced 762 hospitalised AECOPD during five-year follow up. Poorer performance of SPPB was associated with both higher rate (IRR 1.08 per 1 point decrease, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14) and increased length of stay (IRR 1.18 per 1 point decrease, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.27) for hospitalised AECOPD. …”
  13. 233
  14. 234
  15. 235
  16. 236
  17. 237
  18. 238
  19. 239

    Image_2_Serum Zinc-α2-Glycoprotein Levels Were Decreased in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JPEG by Meijuan Liu (4924417)

    Published 2019
    “…At the cutoff value of 7.955 μg/mL serum ZAG, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating patients with PCAD from controls were 50.5 and 78.0%, respectively. The combination of ZAG with other clinical variables including age, gender, BMI, SBP, FBG, TC, HDL-C, Cr, and Urea had significantly improved the diagnosis accuracy with a sensitivity of 82.6%, a specificity of 95.0%, and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.940–0.975, p < 0.05).…”
  20. 240

    Image_1_Serum Zinc-α2-Glycoprotein Levels Were Decreased in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JPEG by Meijuan Liu (4924417)

    Published 2019
    “…At the cutoff value of 7.955 μg/mL serum ZAG, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating patients with PCAD from controls were 50.5 and 78.0%, respectively. The combination of ZAG with other clinical variables including age, gender, BMI, SBP, FBG, TC, HDL-C, Cr, and Urea had significantly improved the diagnosis accuracy with a sensitivity of 82.6%, a specificity of 95.0%, and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.940–0.975, p < 0.05).…”