Showing 1 - 20 results of 41,931 for search '(((( 50 ((a decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ) OR ( 15 n decrease ))) OR ( 12 mg decrease ))*', query time: 1.45s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Decreased oscillatory flow decreases <i>klf2a</i> expression. by Julien Vermot (257990)

    Published 2009
    “…(G) <i>klf2a</i> expression decreases after 15-h lidocaine treatment (90%, <i>n</i> = 67). …”
  4. 4

    Ageing results in an abrupt decrease in overall neurogenesis in the mouse DG. by Joana Gil-Mohapel (462002)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>C57BL/6J male mice with 1.5, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age received BrdU injections (200 mg/kg i.p.) every 12 hours for 3 consecutive days and were sacrificed by transcardial perfusion 42 days later, to allow enough time for differentiation of the proliferating cells that incorporated BrdU. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    DHT increases whereas orchidectomy decreases the weight and cross sectional area of hindlimb muscles. by Young-Eun Yoo (323357)

    Published 2013
    “…<b>B:</b> In WT mice, DHT increased the weight of TA muscle by 12% (71.2±2.5 mg), whereas orchidectomy decreased it by 12% (56.1±3.6 mg) compared with control WT mice (63.6±1.5 mg). …”
  14. 14

    Supplementary Material for: Cardiac Troponin Is Elevated in Patients with Thyrotoxicosis and Decreases as Thyroid Function Improves and Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Decrease by Watanabe N. (4118812)

    Published 2020
    “…Correlations were found between a decrease in hsTnI and BNP in the first 3 months (ρ = 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    At lower concentrations, METH decreases LTP. by Jarod Swant (246454)

    Published 2010
    “…At 0.1 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.08 [<i>n</i> = 13(5)] (Fig. 1B); at 1 µM METH, LTP was 1.50±.07 [<i>n</i> = 13(7)] (Fig. 1C); at 10 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.07 [<i>n</i> = 14(8)] (Fig. 1D); at 30 µM METH, LTP was 1.37±.06 [<i>n</i> = 15(4)] (Fig. 1E); and at 60 µM METH, LTP was 1.32±.24 [<i>n</i> = 4(2)] (Fig. 1E). …”