Showing 1 - 20 results of 85,874 for search '(((( 50 ((ns decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 1_ we decrease ))) OR ( _ e decrease ))', query time: 1.06s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Data_Sheet_1_Perceptual Priming Can Increase or Decrease With Aging.PDF by Kalathupiriyan A. Zhivago (9659504)

    Published 2020
    “…However, whether and how implicit perceptual memory varies with aging or cognitive impairment is unclear. Here, we compared implicit perceptual memory and explicit memory measures in three groups of participants: (1) 59 healthy young volunteers (20–30 years); (2) 269 healthy old volunteers (50–90 years) and (3) 21 patients with mild cognitive impairment, i.e., MCI (50–90 years). …”
  7. 7
  8. 8

    HFD induces LDs and decreases ER and mitochondria in nephrocytes. by Aleksandra Lubojemska (10746241)

    Published 2021
    “…(<b>E</b>) Low and high magnification views of pericardial nephrocytes (dotted outlines) from STD and HFD larvae, showing that HFD decreases mitochondria (marked with anti-ATP5A) and ER (marked with anti-KDEL) but increases LDs (marked with LipidTOX). …”
  9. 9

    Colon tissue and organoid AJC protein expression is decreased with LD shifting in Per2::Luc mice. by Laura Tran (10924702)

    Published 2021
    “…Both demonstrated a significant decrease in E-cadherin in the shifted mice (p<0.05). …”
  10. 10

    E<sub>50</sub> values. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    E<sub>50</sub> values of angle. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  14. 14

    Curve fitting of E<sub>50</sub>. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  15. 15

    Fitting curves of E<sub>50</sub>. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  16. 16

    E<sub>50</sub> values of size. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  17. 17

    E<sub>50</sub> fluctuation coefficient. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  18. 18

    Fitting relationship of E<sub>50</sub>. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  19. 19

    Fitting curve of E<sub>50</sub>. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
  20. 20