Search alternatives:
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Variable importance plot (mean decrease accuracy and mean decrease Gini).
Published 2020“…The higher the value of mean decrease accuracy or mean decrease Gini score, the higher the importance of the variable in the model.…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM.
Published 2019“…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
-
7
Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels.
Published 2023“…<b>(D, E)</b> The free cholesterol and cholesterol ester levels in the ER membrane from the cells as in <b>(C)</b>, were quantified with shotgun lipidomics analysis (see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002367#pbio.3002367.s007" target="_blank">S7 Fig</a> and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002367#pbio.3002367.s012" target="_blank">S5 Table</a>) (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 3 independent experiments, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, nonsignificant (ns) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
FTY720 treatment decreased tumor growth in a xenograft model of hepatoblastoma.
Published 2019“…The mean ± SEM for each treatment group were calculated and depicted in a bar graph. …”
-
19
-
20
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…These mice exhibited a minimal change in noise-evoked PPy activity when comparing the first and second week of imaging (2-way ANOVA, F = 1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.11, post hoc baseline w1 50 dB: baseline w2 50 dB <i>p</i> = 1 Bonferroni corrected, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session) F = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.12, mean ± SE). …”