Search alternatives:
nn decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
50 a » 50 μ (Expand Search), 50 c (Expand Search), 5 a (Expand Search)
nn decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
50 a » 50 μ (Expand Search), 50 c (Expand Search), 5 a (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Pre-treatment LLM, month of start and end of sustained (≥ 4 months) decrease in LLM by ≥ 50% from pre-treatment LLM, to < 8100 mf/ml or < 30000 mf/ml by treatment arm for participants with a sustained decrease by ≥ 50%.
Published 2016“…<p>Pre-treatment LLM, month of start and end of sustained (≥ 4 months) decrease in LLM by ≥ 50% from pre-treatment LLM, to < 8100 mf/ml or < 30000 mf/ml by treatment arm for participants with a sustained decrease by ≥ 50%.…”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Topography of the relationship between the change in alpha power decrease and the change in M50 gating ratio.
Published 2013“…B: Relationship between change in alpha power decrease (abscissa, negative values indicate improvement) and pre-to-post-training change in M50 gating ratio (ordinate, positive values indicate changes towards normal, that is, smaller gating ratio) by patient training group based on the ROI in 4A.…”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP).
Published 2014“…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
-
20
Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33].
Published 2014“…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”