Search alternatives:
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 mean » 20 means (Expand Search)
50 ns » 50 ms (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 mean » 20 means (Expand Search)
50 ns » 50 ms (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Mechlorethamine gel causes epithelium thinning, epithelium-stroma separation, and decreased total stroma cell count.
Published 2025“…*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. ns = no significance. N = 3-5. Scale bars = 50 µm. st. = stroma.…”
-
9
-
10
The decrease or inhibition of Hsp90 induced REST degradation.
Published 2019“…(D) The level of REST dramatically reduced in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells treated with GA (1 μM) or PU-H71 (50 nM) at 24 h. (E) The REST level decreased by GA more than 50% and (F) PU-H71 more than 80%, respectively. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels.
Published 2023“…<b>(F)</b> qPCR analysis for cholesterogenic genes from NIH3T3 cells exposed to cholesterol (50 μm) or 25-hydroxycholesterol (10 μm) under 5% or 1% CO<sub>2</sub> for 4 h (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 3 biological replicates per condition, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001, nonsignificant (ns), two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test). …”
-
19
-
20
Does Mean Platelet Volume Decrease in the presence of Coronary Artery Fistula?
Published 2019“…Compared to the control group, median (IQR) High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels were significantly higher (p=0.04) and MPV levels were significantly lower in the CAF group (8.84 ± 1.71fL vs. 10.43 ± 1.34, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only MPV was a significant predictor of CAF (p < 0.001, 95% CI for OR: 0.438 (0.306-0.629). …”