Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
50 ms » 50 mg (Expand Search), 50 mm (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
50 ms » 50 mg (Expand Search), 50 mm (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
Preserved NSS at 2 and at 24 hours following ischemia and decreased infarct volume in PAR1 KO mice 24 hours following ischemic stroke.
Published 2021“…(C) Total infarct volume is significantly lower in PAR1 KO mice compared to control (t-test, WT = 6, PAR1 KO = 6). (D) Infarct volume decreases as a function of distance from the ischemic core (slices #5&6). …”
-
48
-
49
Graphical example of how mean squared error (MSE) can decrease while skill gets worse for two region example.
Published 2021“…Since a decrease in MSE means an improvement and a decrease in forecast skill means a lack of improvement, we see that coherence can have opposite effects on the two scores.…”
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60