Search alternatives:
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
mg decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
50 nn » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 n (Expand Search)
5 nm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 cm (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
mg decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
50 nn » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 n (Expand Search)
5 nm » 5 mm (Expand Search), 5 cm (Expand Search)
-
41
Investigation of <i>In Vacuo</i> Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
Published 2020“…Decreasing the number of supercycles from 3 (∼0.99 nm) to 1 supercycle (∼0.33 nm) resulted in a monotonic decrease in CBM from 1.71 to 1.49 eV, showing some frustration of growth during earlier atomic layer deposition cycles. …”
-
42
Investigation of <i>In Vacuo</i> Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
Published 2020“…Decreasing the number of supercycles from 3 (∼0.99 nm) to 1 supercycle (∼0.33 nm) resulted in a monotonic decrease in CBM from 1.71 to 1.49 eV, showing some frustration of growth during earlier atomic layer deposition cycles. …”
-
43
Investigation of <i>In Vacuo</i> Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
Published 2020“…Decreasing the number of supercycles from 3 (∼0.99 nm) to 1 supercycle (∼0.33 nm) resulted in a monotonic decrease in CBM from 1.71 to 1.49 eV, showing some frustration of growth during earlier atomic layer deposition cycles. …”
-
44
Investigation of <i>In Vacuo</i> Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
Published 2020“…Decreasing the number of supercycles from 3 (∼0.99 nm) to 1 supercycle (∼0.33 nm) resulted in a monotonic decrease in CBM from 1.71 to 1.49 eV, showing some frustration of growth during earlier atomic layer deposition cycles. …”
-
45
Investigation of <i>In Vacuo</i> Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
Published 2020“…Decreasing the number of supercycles from 3 (∼0.99 nm) to 1 supercycle (∼0.33 nm) resulted in a monotonic decrease in CBM from 1.71 to 1.49 eV, showing some frustration of growth during earlier atomic layer deposition cycles. …”
-
46
Investigation of <i>In Vacuo</i> Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin MgAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> Using Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy
Published 2020“…Decreasing the number of supercycles from 3 (∼0.99 nm) to 1 supercycle (∼0.33 nm) resulted in a monotonic decrease in CBM from 1.71 to 1.49 eV, showing some frustration of growth during earlier atomic layer deposition cycles. …”
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025“…By compiling a global data set of 1,782 paired observations from 185 publications, we show that land use conversion from natural to managed ecosystems significantly reduced NNM by 7.5% (−11.5, −2.8%) and increased NN by 150% (86, 194%), indicating decreasing N availability while increasing potential N loss through denitrification and nitrate leaching. …”
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
Trial profile.
Published 2024“…Both contraceptives substantially decreased, from D0 to 25W, the total testosterone [DMPA-IM D0 0.560, 25W 0.423 nmol/L, -24.3% (p < 0.0001); NET-EN D0 0.551, 25W 0.253 nmol/L, -54.1%, (p < 0.0001)], SHBG [DMPA-IM D0 45.0, 25W 32.7 nmol/L, -29.8% (p < 0.0001); NET-EN D0 50.2, 25W 17.6 nmol/L, -65.1% (p < 0.0001)], and calculated free testosterone levels [DMPA-IM D0 6.87, 25W 5.38 pmol/L, -17.2% (p = 0.0371); NET-EN D0 6.00, 25W 3.70, -40.0% (p < 0.0001)]. …”
-
59
-
60