Search alternatives:
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes + : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
mTORC1 hyperactivation led to a decreased autophagic activity in the podocytes.
Published 2020“…Results are expressed as means ± s.d. *<i>P</i> < 0.05 compared with age-matched controls.…”
-
15
-
16
Datasheet1_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf
Published 2023“…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). Returning to the community was a protective factor [OR 0.31 (0.09–0.94); p = 0.045]. …”
-
17
Datasheet2_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf
Published 2023“…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). Returning to the community was a protective factor [OR 0.31 (0.09–0.94); p = 0.045]. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…The reduction in activity was particularly striking at moderate sound intensities (mean ± SE, 1-way ANOVA, F = 14.24, <i>p</i> = 1.0 × 10<sup>−13</sup> and <i>t</i> test for each level: 20 dB <i>p</i> = 8.4 × 10<sup>−05</sup>, 30 dB <i>p</i> = 1, 40 dB <i>p</i> = 0.350 dB <i>p</i> = 4.9 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, 60 dB <i>p</i> = 2.4 × 10<sup>−15</sup>, 70 dB <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup> all corrected for multiple comparisons. …”