Showing 1 - 20 results of 17,291 for search '(((( 59 ((nn decrease) OR (_ decrease)) ) OR ( _ web decrease ))) OR ( 2 step decrease ))*', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Fluorescence rise response of inverse-pericam and IP2.0 to a stepped decrease in Ca2+ by Sayuri Hara-Kuge (4954180)

    Published 2018
    “…This is the data of fluorescence rise response of inverse-pericam and IP2.0 to a stepped decrease in Ca<sup>2+</sup>, which was used in the study Hara-Kuge et al.(2018).…”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Network and biological properties of high quality marine food webs, ordered by decreasing connectance. by Tomás Ignacio Marina (5309588)

    Published 2018
    “…<p>Network and biological properties of high quality marine food webs, ordered by decreasing connectance.</p>…”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Sample characteristics (N = 59). by Mel Major (15285799)

    Published 2023
    “…While all measures were well below predicted values at hospital discharge (MIP: 68.4%, MEP 76.0%, HGS 73.3% of predicted and FEC 54.8 steps/2m), significant 6-month recovery was seen for all outcomes. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Table of step height. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  19. 19

    The well wall step. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  20. 20