The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

“…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”

The ROC curves and AUC values of the diagnostic model. by Zhe Wu (582498)

<b>Supporting data for manuscript</b> "<b>Voluntary locomotion induces an early and remote hemodynamic decrease in the large cerebral veins</b>" by Kira Shaw (18796168)

“…The locomotion values (traces and metrics) are in arbitrary units with larger integers representing a greater displacement of the spherical treadmill, the hemodynamic (Hbt) values (traces and metrics) are a percentage change from the normalised baseline (prior to stimulus presentation), and the corresponding time series vector is presented in seconds. …”

A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

ROC curve and AUC value of all models. by Tiago de Oliveira Barreto (20485207)

“…As for Specificity (82.94%) and ROC-AUC (82.13%), the Multilayer Perceptron with SGD optimizer obtained the highest scores. …”

Column charts of WiAUC in therapy and control group at baseline and follow-up. by Felix L. Herr (21544362)

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Distribution of final population size (A) and mean change in mean MSI over time (B) over 100 simulations for each parameter set shown in Table 3 in the absence of weevils (left) an... by Alexandra M. Campbell (3284094)

Subjects:

Feature importance and beeswarm plot determined by mean absolute SHAP values for the DeepSurv model. by Theophilus Gyedu Baidoo (21162511)

“…<p>(A) A comprehensive view of the influence each variable has on model predictions, with N Stage Status ranked on top (B) Bar plot of mean absolute SHAP values by decreasing order of importance</p>…”

Root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) analysis of wild-type and p.R163C mutant αB-crystallin dimers from molecular dynamics simulations. by Aref Baharvand (21713886)

Subjects:

Feature importance and beeswarm plot determined by mean absolute SHAP values for the random survival forest (RSF) model. by Theophilus Gyedu Baidoo (21162511)

“…(B) Bar plot of mean absolute SHAP values by decreasing order of importance.…”

Lifespan of a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette. by Alexandra M. Campbell (3284094)

Subjects:

Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

“…With amplitude scaling the mean population activity was kept the same by scaling down the response amplitude for larger population (blue curve). …”

Variables for the bromeliad agent representing a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette. by Alexandra M. Campbell (3284094)

Subjects:

Daily number of adverse outcomes (bars) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PRC) per day of the fullPIERS model. by Guiyou Yang (10259597)

Daily number of adverse outcomes (bars) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PRC) per day of the PIERS-ML model. by Guiyou Yang (10259597)

Area under the curve (AUC) for external validation performance. by Junichi Kushioka (12236447)

List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”