Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
16 cases » 19 cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
24 cases » 19 cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
16 cases » 19 cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
24 cases » 19 cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
c large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The analyzed data of the 532 cases of this study.
Published 2025“…Compared with well-nourished group, the abnormal group showed a decrease in the BBS scores [(52.55 ± 7.10) vs (43.20 ± 16.29), <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05], and an increase in the TUG [9.00 (7.00, 10.00) vs 9.00 (7.40, 12.00), <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05] and the FTSST [12.00 (9.00, 14.75) vs 15.00 (10.00, 20.10), <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05]. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20