Showing 1 - 20 results of 6,319 for search '(((( _ largest decrease ) OR ( a greater distance ))) OR ( ((ai large) OR (via large)) decrease ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    (DSD) in Germany and the US, weighted, scale 1–4 (higher score indicates a greater desire for social distance). by Tae Jun Kim (4663141)

    Published 2019
    “…<p>(DSD) in Germany and the US, weighted, scale 1–4 (higher score indicates a greater desire for social distance).</p>…”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Data Sheet 1_Emotional prompting amplifies disinformation generation in AI large language models.docx by Rasita Vinay (21006911)

    Published 2025
    “…Introduction<p>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs), which can produce text that closely resembles human-written content, presents both opportunities and risks. …”
  8. 8

    Number of birds that chose the side of the olfactometry chamber containing the scent of a conspecific of the opposite sex with greater (black) or lower (grey) a) MHC-I amino acid distance or b) MHC-I functional distance. by Luisa Amo (339447)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Number of birds that chose the side of the olfactometry chamber containing the scent of a conspecific of the opposite sex with greater (black) or lower (grey) a) MHC-I amino acid distance or b) MHC-I functional distance.…”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Model for bird choice in relation to: The difference in the MHC-I functional distance between the focal birds and the two scent donor birds of the opposite sex (as a dichotomous variable: Greater MHC-I functional distance (yes) vs. lower MHC-I functional distance (no)). by Luisa Amo (339447)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Model for bird choice in relation to: The difference in the MHC-I functional distance between the focal birds and the two scent donor birds of the opposite sex (as a dichotomous variable: Greater MHC-I functional distance (yes) vs. lower MHC-I functional distance (no)).…”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Comparison of three genetic distances. by James A. Watson (7305206)

    Published 2020
    “…Note that the y-axes in panels A-C are on a log<sub>10</sub> scale. The set of distances such that −log<sub>2</sub> IBD is approximately 12.5 are those with estimated IBD equal to zero, replaced by a lower limit of quantification equal to the smallest IBD value greater than zero. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    The proportion of points with a 4-dB or greater decline in the groups in which the distances to the abnormal FAF differed (P = 0.113, Fisher’s exact test). by Tsutomu Yasukawa (6411377)

    Published 2019
    “…<p>The proportion of points with a 4-dB or greater decline in the groups in which the distances to the abnormal FAF differed (P = 0.113, Fisher’s exact test).…”
  19. 19
  20. 20