Showing 1 - 20 results of 11,887 for search '(((( a ((e decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( a marker decrease ))) OR ( a linear decrease ))', query time: 0.78s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Effects of GJE extract treatment decreased expression of NF-kB p65. by Natnicha Suttawong (22367172)

    Published 2025
    “…The percentage of positive staining for NF-kB p65 (E). Data are expressed as mean ± SD, error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 6/group. a: when compared to the control group. b: when compared to the NF group, <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05 for both a and b.…”
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Linear regression analysis. by Young Kyu Lee (14076058)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p> Conclusion </p><p>The HTRT group showed a greater decrease in HU both pre- and post-treatment, indicating a possible indirect marker of tumor necrosis. …”
  6. 6

    Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i> by Razia Rashid Rahil (22772495)

    Published 2025
    “…Bar graphs depicted EVO increased mRNA expression of (D) SM22α and decreased (E) RUNX2 in CER treated P<sub>i</sub>-induced VSMCs. …”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    S2 File - Factors influencing effective decrease of controlled attenuation parameters in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease: A multilevel linear regression analysis at Vajira Hospital by Sonsawan Sangprasert (22772538)

    Published 2025
    “…S2 File - <p>Factors influencing effective decrease of controlled attenuation parameters in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease: A multilevel linear regression analysis at Vajira Hospital</p>…”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  20. 20