Showing 1 - 20 results of 6,249 for search '(((( a ((web decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( _ any decrease ))) OR ( _ larger decrease ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1

    The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

    Published 2025
    “…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…However, there was an overall decrease in anxiety level of mothers following any type of counseling.…”
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…With amplitude scaling the mean population activity was kept the same by scaling down the response amplitude for larger population (blue curve). …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”