Search alternatives:
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
_ gender » _ gene (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
_ gender » _ gene (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
6
-
7
Association of each health behavior and the reported decrease in psychological well-being during the pandemic between individuals who often/very often compared to rarely/never engaged in health behaviors. Results are predicted means and 95% confidence intervals from linear model analysis adjusted for age, gender, worked in patient care, had school aged children, near high-risk relatives and in high-risk group....
Published 2025“…Results are predicted means and 95% confidence intervals from linear model analysis adjusted for age, gender, worked in patient care, had school aged children, near high-risk relatives and in high-risk group. …”
-
8
Effect of each health behavior on the reported decrease in physical health during the pandemic between individuals who often/very often compared to rarely/never engaged in health behaviors. Results are predicted means and 95% confidence intervals from linear model analysis adjusted for age, gender, worked in patient care, had school aged children, near high-risk relatives and in high-risk group....
Published 2025“…Results are predicted means and 95% confidence intervals from linear model analysis adjusted for age, gender, worked in patient care, had school aged children, near high-risk relatives and in high-risk group. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…With amplitude scaling the mean population activity was kept the same by scaling down the response amplitude for larger population (blue curve). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Changes in AL (A) and SE (B) according to the treatment time estimation curve in patients given 0.125% atropine.
Published 2025“…A larger In4_ALE correlated significantly with larger changes in AL at 6 months after In4_ALE in all myopic children. …”
-
17
-
18
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”