Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
a sizes » _ sizes (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
a sizes » _ sizes (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Characteristic size values.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
E<sub>50</sub> values of size.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Critical pore size values of each coal sample.
Published 2025“…The variations in the maximum and minimum values of vertical principal stress at each peak level are 1.04, 1.04, and 1.05 times, respectively. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Study 1_CFA1.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
19
-
20