Search alternatives:
within function » fibrin function (Expand Search), python function (Expand Search), protein function (Expand Search)
algorithm rate » algorithm based (Expand Search), algorithm a (Expand Search), algorithm ai (Expand Search)
algorithm etc » algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm a (Expand Search)
rate function » brain function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), gene function (Expand Search)
etc function » fc function (Expand Search), spc function (Expand Search), npc function (Expand Search)
within function » fibrin function (Expand Search), python function (Expand Search), protein function (Expand Search)
algorithm rate » algorithm based (Expand Search), algorithm a (Expand Search), algorithm ai (Expand Search)
algorithm etc » algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm a (Expand Search)
rate function » brain function (Expand Search), a function (Expand Search), gene function (Expand Search)
etc function » fc function (Expand Search), spc function (Expand Search), npc function (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
The convergence curves of the test functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
11
Single-peaked reference functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
12
-
13
Identifying cognitive impairment with story recall (Wilson et al., 2024)
Published 2024“…Discourse data were used to classify participants testing within range of cognitive impairment using multiple machine learning algorithms and stability analysis for identifying reliably predictive features in an effort to maximize prediction accuracy. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
18
Fixed-dimensional multimodal reference functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
19
Test results of multimodal benchmark functions.
Published 2025“…Utilizing the diabetes dataset from 130 U.S. hospitals, the LGWO-BP algorithm achieved a precision rate of 0.97, a sensitivity of 1.00, a correct classification rate of 0.99, a harmonic mean of precision and recall (F1-score) of 0.98, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 1.00. …”
-
20
Wav2DDK: An automated DDK estimation algorithm (Kadambi et al., 2023)
Published 2023“…Estimated rates achieve a high test-retest reliability (<em>r</em> = .95) and show good correlation with the revised ALS functional rating scale speech subscore (<em>r </em>= .67).…”