Search alternatives:
algorithm sphere » algorithm where (Expand Search), algorithm pre (Expand Search), algorithm shows (Expand Search)
sphere function » severe functional (Expand Search), reserve function (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
algorithm its » algorithm i (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search), algorithm iqa (Expand Search)
both function » body function (Expand Search), growth function (Expand Search), beach function (Expand Search)
its function » i function (Expand Search), loss function (Expand Search), cost function (Expand Search)
algorithm sphere » algorithm where (Expand Search), algorithm pre (Expand Search), algorithm shows (Expand Search)
sphere function » severe functional (Expand Search), reserve function (Expand Search)
algorithm both » algorithm blood (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search)
algorithm its » algorithm i (Expand Search), algorithm etc (Expand Search), algorithm iqa (Expand Search)
both function » body function (Expand Search), growth function (Expand Search), beach function (Expand Search)
its function » i function (Expand Search), loss function (Expand Search), cost function (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Results of searching performance of different algorithm models on the Sphere function and Griewank function.
Published 2021“…<p>Results of searching performance of different algorithm models on the Sphere function and Griewank function.…”
-
6
-
7
The pseudocode for the NAFPSO algorithm.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
8
PSO algorithm flowchart.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Scheduling time of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
12
Convergence speed of five algorithms.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. …”
-
13
-
14
Completion times for different algorithms.
Published 2025“…This paper first analyzes the H-beam processing flow and appropriately simplifies it, develops a reinforcement learning environment for multi-agent scheduling, and applies the rMAPPO algorithm to make scheduling decisions. The effectiveness of the proposed method is then verified on both the physical work cell for riveting and welding and its digital twin platform, and it is compared with other baseline multi-agent reinforcement learning methods (MAPPO, MADDPG, and MASAC). …”
-
15
The average cumulative reward of algorithms.
Published 2025“…This paper first analyzes the H-beam processing flow and appropriately simplifies it, develops a reinforcement learning environment for multi-agent scheduling, and applies the rMAPPO algorithm to make scheduling decisions. The effectiveness of the proposed method is then verified on both the physical work cell for riveting and welding and its digital twin platform, and it is compared with other baseline multi-agent reinforcement learning methods (MAPPO, MADDPG, and MASAC). …”
-
16
CEC2017 basic functions.
Published 2025“…During experimental evaluation, the efficiency of OP-ZOA was verified using the CEC2017 test functions, demonstrating superior performance compared to seven recently proposed meta-heuristic algorithms (Bloodsucking Leech Algorithm (BSLO), Parrot Optimization Algorithm (PO), Polar Lights Algorithm (PLO), Red-tailed Hawk Optimization Algorithm (RTH), Bitterling Fish Optimization Algorithm (BFO), Spider Wasp Optimization Algorithm (SWO) and Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA)). …”
-
17
Simulation settings of rMAPPO algorithm.
Published 2025“…This paper first analyzes the H-beam processing flow and appropriately simplifies it, develops a reinforcement learning environment for multi-agent scheduling, and applies the rMAPPO algorithm to make scheduling decisions. The effectiveness of the proposed method is then verified on both the physical work cell for riveting and welding and its digital twin platform, and it is compared with other baseline multi-agent reinforcement learning methods (MAPPO, MADDPG, and MASAC). …”
-
18
Parameters of the proposed algorithm.
Published 2023“…First, MaAVOA was applied to the DTLZ functions, and its performance was compared to that of several popular many-objective algorithms and according to the results, MaAVOA outperforms the competitor algorithms in terms of inverted generational distance and hypervolume performance measures and has a beneficial adaptation ability in terms of both convergence and diversity performance measures. …”
-
19
CEC2017 test function test results.
Published 2025“…During experimental evaluation, the efficiency of OP-ZOA was verified using the CEC2017 test functions, demonstrating superior performance compared to seven recently proposed meta-heuristic algorithms (Bloodsucking Leech Algorithm (BSLO), Parrot Optimization Algorithm (PO), Polar Lights Algorithm (PLO), Red-tailed Hawk Optimization Algorithm (RTH), Bitterling Fish Optimization Algorithm (BFO), Spider Wasp Optimization Algorithm (SWO) and Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA)). …”
-
20
Statistical results of various algorithms.
Published 2025“…Results from experiments confirm that the enhanced WOA algorithm outperforms the standard WOA algorithm in terms of both fitness value and convergence speed. …”