Search alternatives:
where function » sphere function (Expand Search), gene function (Expand Search), wave function (Expand Search)
algorithm pre » algorithm used (Expand Search), algorithm from (Expand Search), algorithm _ (Expand Search)
pre function » spread function (Expand Search), sphere function (Expand Search), three function (Expand Search)
algorithm a » algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithms _ (Expand Search)
a function » _ function (Expand Search)
where function » sphere function (Expand Search), gene function (Expand Search), wave function (Expand Search)
algorithm pre » algorithm used (Expand Search), algorithm from (Expand Search), algorithm _ (Expand Search)
pre function » spread function (Expand Search), sphere function (Expand Search), three function (Expand Search)
algorithm a » algorithm _ (Expand Search), algorithm b (Expand Search), algorithms _ (Expand Search)
a function » _ function (Expand Search)
-
1
As for Fig 2, we present failure rates as a function of the cohort size (vertical axis) versus the number of distractors (horizontal axis), for the Smyth and McClave baseline algorithm from [76].
Published 2020“…In the middle left, the converse case, where the embedded cohort is skewed, but the distractors balanced, and finally in the middle right a case where both the embedded cohort to be selected and the distractors have a highly skewed distribution. …”
-
2
Comparison of deconvolution and optimization algorithms on a batch of data.
Published 2021“…Both experimental data have been resampled at 50ms and used to compute a set of TFs (in orange) either with direct deconvolution approaches (Fourier or Toeplitz methods, middle-upper panel TFs) or with 1-Γ function optimization performed by 3 different algorithms (middle-lower panel TFs). …”
-
3
Prediction performance of different optimization algorithms.
Published 2021“…<p>(A) 3 algorithms were compared in terms of the residuals of the cost function of the optimized TF on 7 mice datasets (Derivative free algorithm failed in optimizing a TF in a mouse). …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Using synthetic data to test group-searching algorithms in a context where the correct grouping of species is known and uniquely defined.
Published 2024“…The reaction network is assumed to form a linear degradation chain 1 → 2 → ⋯ → <i>N</i> with the end-product concentration (metabolite <i>N</i>, orange) taken as the function of interest (shown with <i>N</i> = 3 as an example). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Background heterogeneity and sequencing depth improve WheresWalker SNPindex.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Algorithm parameter setting.
Published 2023“…Experimental results show that the PSCACO algorithm proposed in this paper is compared with MOPSO, CACO and NSGA-II algorithms, and the convergence effect of the algorithm is concluded to be more effective to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of chaotic particle ant colony algorithm for solving multi-objective functions, which proposes a new feasible solution for the supply chain management.…”
-
18
Algorithm parameter setting.
Published 2023“…Experimental results show that the PSCACO algorithm proposed in this paper is compared with MOPSO, CACO and NSGA-II algorithms, and the convergence effect of the algorithm is concluded to be more effective to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of chaotic particle ant colony algorithm for solving multi-objective functions, which proposes a new feasible solution for the supply chain management.…”
-
19
-
20
Membership function of each target.
Published 2023“…Experimental results show that the PSCACO algorithm proposed in this paper is compared with MOPSO, CACO and NSGA-II algorithms, and the convergence effect of the algorithm is concluded to be more effective to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of chaotic particle ant colony algorithm for solving multi-objective functions, which proposes a new feasible solution for the supply chain management.…”