Showing 41 - 60 results of 69,389 for search '(((( all values decrease ) OR ( i rate increased ))) OR ( ((i largest) OR (via large)) decrease ))', query time: 2.32s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42
  3. 43

    Increasing incidence of invasive nontyphoidal <i>Salmonella</i> infections in Queensland, Australia, 2007-2016 by Andrea Parisi (324535)

    Published 2019
    “…Overall, there was a 6,5% annual increase (p<0.001) in iNTS disease incidence. In conclusion, high iNTS rates among males, infants, and the elderly require investigation of household level risk factors for NTS infection. …”
  4. 44
  5. 45

    Alcohol-induced fatalities and crude rates in the United States at the county level. by Tony Wong (779773)

    Published 2025
    “…A Gini index of 0 implies that the crude rate is the same for all counties. If all alcohol-induced fatalities occurred in one out of N<sub>c</sub> counties, the Gini index would be 1 − 1/N<sub>c</sub>. …”
  6. 46
  7. 47
  8. 48
  9. 49
  10. 50
  11. 51
  12. 52
  13. 53

    Loss of <i>Nf1</i> increases metabolic rate during waking and sleeping. by Elizabeth B. Brown (4582978)

    Published 2023
    “…In the daytime, <i>nf1</i><sup>P1</sup> mutants significantly increase waking CO<sub>2</sub> output compared to control and heterozygote flies (+, <i>P</i><0.0003; het, <i>P</i><0.0412). …”
  14. 54

    Model component for increasing the mutation rate of <i>KRAS</i> after MMR deficiency. by Saskia Haupt (10819045)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>Gene mutation graph of <i>KRAS</i> for the matrix <i>F</i> with the <i>KRAS</i> mutation rate increased by a factor <i>ζ</i>.…”
  15. 55
  16. 56
  17. 57
  18. 58

    Table1_Leukocyte telomere length decreased the risk of mortality in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease.docx by Jiahong Yi (14481735)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>LTL was a negative factor for all-cause mortality (all p-value < 0.05). The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related death was decreased in Q3 (p < 0.001) and Q4 levels of LTL (p < 0.001) compared with the Q1 group. …”
  19. 59
  20. 60