Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
i also » _ also (Expand Search), mri also (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
i also » _ also (Expand Search), mri also (Expand Search)
-
1
Image_1_Identification and Assessment of Necroptosis-Related Genes in Clinical Prognosis and Immune Cells in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.jpeg
Published 2022“…The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram, risk score, and International Prognostic Index was 0.723, 0.712, and 0.537, respectively. γ/δ T cells and Macrophage 1 cells decreased while Macrophage 2 cells and Natural Killer resting cells increased in the high-risk group. …”
-
2
DataSheet_1_Identification and Assessment of Necroptosis-Related Genes in Clinical Prognosis and Immune Cells in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.xlsx
Published 2022“…The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram, risk score, and International Prognostic Index was 0.723, 0.712, and 0.537, respectively. γ/δ T cells and Macrophage 1 cells decreased while Macrophage 2 cells and Natural Killer resting cells increased in the high-risk group. …”
-
3
Image_2_Identification and Assessment of Necroptosis-Related Genes in Clinical Prognosis and Immune Cells in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.jpeg
Published 2022“…The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram, risk score, and International Prognostic Index was 0.723, 0.712, and 0.537, respectively. γ/δ T cells and Macrophage 1 cells decreased while Macrophage 2 cells and Natural Killer resting cells increased in the high-risk group. …”
-
4
Image_4_Identification and Assessment of Necroptosis-Related Genes in Clinical Prognosis and Immune Cells in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.jpeg
Published 2022“…The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram, risk score, and International Prognostic Index was 0.723, 0.712, and 0.537, respectively. γ/δ T cells and Macrophage 1 cells decreased while Macrophage 2 cells and Natural Killer resting cells increased in the high-risk group. …”
-
5
Image_3_Identification and Assessment of Necroptosis-Related Genes in Clinical Prognosis and Immune Cells in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.jpeg
Published 2022“…The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram, risk score, and International Prognostic Index was 0.723, 0.712, and 0.537, respectively. γ/δ T cells and Macrophage 1 cells decreased while Macrophage 2 cells and Natural Killer resting cells increased in the high-risk group. …”
-
6
DataSheet_2_Identification and Assessment of Necroptosis-Related Genes in Clinical Prognosis and Immune Cells in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.docx
Published 2022“…The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram, risk score, and International Prognostic Index was 0.723, 0.712, and 0.537, respectively. γ/δ T cells and Macrophage 1 cells decreased while Macrophage 2 cells and Natural Killer resting cells increased in the high-risk group. …”
-
7
DataSheet_1_An antigen processing and presentation signature for prognostic evaluation and immunotherapy selection in advanced gastric cancer.zip
Published 2022“…The APscore also was a prognostic biomarker in 467 aGC patients (HR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.21−2.46). …”
-
8
Image_1_Multi-Component Comparative Pharmacokinetics in Rats After Oral Administration of Fructus aurantii Extract, Naringin, Neohesperidin, and Naringin-Neohesperidin.pdf
Published 2020“…There were significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for naringenin and hesperetin between the compatibility, FA extract group vs monomer group: ① remarkable increases in the values of AUC<sub>(0–∞)</sub>, AUC<sub>(0–t)</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>; ② obvious decrease of CL<sub>Z/F</sub>; and ③ longer t<sub>max</sub> and t<sub>1/2z</sub>. …”
-
9
Table_1_Multi-Component Comparative Pharmacokinetics in Rats After Oral Administration of Fructus aurantii Extract, Naringin, Neohesperidin, and Naringin-Neohesperidin.docx
Published 2020“…There were significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for naringenin and hesperetin between the compatibility, FA extract group vs monomer group: ① remarkable increases in the values of AUC<sub>(0–∞)</sub>, AUC<sub>(0–t)</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>; ② obvious decrease of CL<sub>Z/F</sub>; and ③ longer t<sub>max</sub> and t<sub>1/2z</sub>. …”
-
10
Table_2_Multi-Component Comparative Pharmacokinetics in Rats After Oral Administration of Fructus aurantii Extract, Naringin, Neohesperidin, and Naringin-Neohesperidin.docx
Published 2020“…There were significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for naringenin and hesperetin between the compatibility, FA extract group vs monomer group: ① remarkable increases in the values of AUC<sub>(0–∞)</sub>, AUC<sub>(0–t)</sub> and C<sub>max</sub>; ② obvious decrease of CL<sub>Z/F</sub>; and ③ longer t<sub>max</sub> and t<sub>1/2z</sub>. …”