Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
cases increased » levels increased (Expand Search), cycles increases (Expand Search)
c largest » _ largest (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search)
ic cases » 19 cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
cases increased » levels increased (Expand Search), cycles increases (Expand Search)
c largest » _ largest (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search)
ic cases » 19 cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
ROC curve and AUC value of all models.
Published 2024“…As for Specificity (82.94%) and ROC-AUC (82.13%), the Multilayer Perceptron with SGD optimizer obtained the highest scores. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Statistical analysis of the AUC measurement.
Published 2025“…<p>Analysis indicated that INSv application significantly changed spontaneous calcium activity (IAsp <i>p</i>-value: 0.1290, INSv <i>p</i>-value: 0.0002). The mean AUC decreased in both samples.…”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
AUC statistics comparing statistical trends in control and test populations.
Published 2025“…<p>To evaluate statistical trends, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval (here, days one to sixty), and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger trends. …”
-
20