Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a linear » _ linear (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
-
1
Table_2_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in infants—a pilot observational study.XLSX
Published 2024“…In this observational study, we explore if early life exposure to probiotics via the mother during pregnancy and lactation, is associated with decreased inflammation in breastmilk, maternal and infant microbiome variation, and altered infant neurodevelopmental features.…”
-
2
Table_1_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in infants—a pilot observational study.XLSX
Published 2024“…In this observational study, we explore if early life exposure to probiotics via the mother during pregnancy and lactation, is associated with decreased inflammation in breastmilk, maternal and infant microbiome variation, and altered infant neurodevelopmental features.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Linear regression analysis.
Published 2025“…</p><p> Conclusion </p><p>The HTRT group showed a greater decrease in HU both pre- and post-treatment, indicating a possible indirect marker of tumor necrosis. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…Changes during drug infusion were compared in a linear mixed model to assess the effects of s-ketamine and midazolam compared to saline. …”
-
11
-
12
Table_3_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.docx
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
13
Image_4_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
14
Image_1_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
15
Image_3_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
16
Image_8_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
17
Image_2_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
18
Table_1_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.docx
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
19
Image_7_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
20
Image_9_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”