Showing 1 - 16 results of 16 for search '(((( c large decrease ) OR ( ((c marked) OR (n marked)) decrease ))) OR ( c values increased ))~', query time: 0.73s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Fig 3 - by Nehal Shawky Nagy (17721213)

    Published 2024
    “…All the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey Pairwise Comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 3 rats for each group. …”
  10. 10

    Restoration of normal division rates to <i>stat</i> mutant FSCs requires both excess G1/S and G2/M regulators. by David Melamed (565564)

    Published 2023
    “…For each genotype, above the graph, the average number of marked FSCs at 12d is indicated (“FSC #”). The two values on the top line of the row labeled “Diff’n” are two additional parameters derived from each MARCM lineage analysis: the percentage of FSCs in layer 1 at 6d, followed by the average probability of a layer 1 FSC becoming an FC in a single 12h budding cycle. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Study group background characteristics. by Zicheng Hu (3825313)

    Published 2024
    “…The <b><i>NSE</i></b> group sampling also reflected later recognition and attention to this clinical entity. <b>C</b>. <b>Age</b>. The ages of the subjects were not specifically selected and consequently also varied among groups, with group medians ranging from 39 to 50 years with largely similar ranges. …”