Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
c largest » _ largest (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search)
23 cases » 3 cases (Expand Search), 24 cases (Expand Search), 26 cases (Expand Search)
b large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
c cases » ic cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
c largest » _ largest (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search)
23 cases » 3 cases (Expand Search), 24 cases (Expand Search), 26 cases (Expand Search)
b large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
c cases » ic cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
-
59
-
60
Comparison of estimated epidemic risks (based on data available as of March 16, 2020) and reported increases in cases at the county level between March 16 and March 23, 2020.
Published 2023“…<p>Points indicate the binary outcome for each county of whether it reported at least one (A) or five (B) new COVID-19 cases between March 16 and March 23. The bottom and top of the graph correspond to counties that did or did report such increases. …”