Search alternatives:
complement control » complementary control (Expand Search), coherent control (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
wt algorithm » _ algorithm (Expand Search), ii algorithm (Expand Search), rf algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
elements wt » elements _ (Expand Search), elements b (Expand Search), elements fe (Expand Search)
complement control » complementary control (Expand Search), coherent control (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
wt algorithm » _ algorithm (Expand Search), ii algorithm (Expand Search), rf algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
elements wt » elements _ (Expand Search), elements b (Expand Search), elements fe (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
S1 Graphical abstract -
Published 2025“…The software uses a shape-detection algorithm to single out and track the movement of pillars’ tips for the most common shapes of EHT platforms. …”
-
203
Quantitative results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
204
Counting results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
205
Quantitative results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
206
Main module structure.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
207
Counting results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
208
Quantitative results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
209
Architecture of MAR-YOLOv9.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
210
Quantitative results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
211
Counting results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
212
Example images from four plant datasets.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
213
Counting results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
214
Detection visualization results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
215
-
216
Video 1_TDE-3: an improved prior for optical flow computation in spiking neural networks.mp4
Published 2025“…Proposed in the literature bioinspired neuromorphic Time-Difference Encoder (TDE-2) combines event-based sensors and processors with spiking neural networks to provide real-time and energy-efficient motion detection through extracting temporal correlations between two points in space. However, on the algorithmic level, this design leads to a loss of direction-selectivity of individual TDEs in textured environments. …”
-
217
Data Sheet 1_TDE-3: an improved prior for optical flow computation in spiking neural networks.pdf
Published 2025“…Proposed in the literature bioinspired neuromorphic Time-Difference Encoder (TDE-2) combines event-based sensors and processors with spiking neural networks to provide real-time and energy-efficient motion detection through extracting temporal correlations between two points in space. However, on the algorithmic level, this design leads to a loss of direction-selectivity of individual TDEs in textured environments. …”
-
218
supporting data for PHD thesis entitled " Arousal Regulation and Neurofeedback Treatment for ADHD Children"
Published 2025“…Analyses use standardized mean differences (Hedges g) under random-effects models, stratified by comparator type (medicine, active, sham, passive) and, where applicable, contrasted across protocol families (customised algorithm, SCP, SMR, TBR).</p><p dir="ltr">The supporting dataset contains the <b>raw arm-level descriptive statistics</b> required to compute effect sizes: per study, outcome, and timepoint it lists group means, standard deviations, and sample sizes for neurofeedback and control arms, along with rater, comparator category, protocol type, and outcome direction coding (so higher values consistently reflect the intended construct). …”
-
219
Determining IFI44 as a key lupus nephritis’s biomarker through bioinformatics and immunohistochemistry
Published 2025“…</p> <p>IFI44 shows elevated expression in LN-affected kidneys, compared to healthy controls. The levels of IFI44 positively correlate with serum creatinine and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and inversely with serum complement C3 and initial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).…”
-
220
Echo Peak
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr">For classification, the algorithm iteratively processes the audio in overlapping time windows. …”