بدائل البحث:
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (توسيع البحث), modeling algorithm (توسيع البحث), finding algorithm (توسيع البحث)
cc3d algorithm » cscap algorithm (توسيع البحث), cnn algorithm (توسيع البحث), wold algorithm (توسيع البحث)
complement em » complement _ (توسيع البحث), complement 5a (توسيع البحث), complement c3 (توسيع البحث)
elements cc3d » elements crcy (توسيع البحث), elements ices (توسيع البحث), elements uce (توسيع البحث)
em algorithm » new algorithm (توسيع البحث), _ algorithm (توسيع البحث), ii algorithm (توسيع البحث)
level coding » level according (توسيع البحث), level modeling (توسيع البحث), level using (توسيع البحث)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (توسيع البحث), modeling algorithm (توسيع البحث), finding algorithm (توسيع البحث)
cc3d algorithm » cscap algorithm (توسيع البحث), cnn algorithm (توسيع البحث), wold algorithm (توسيع البحث)
complement em » complement _ (توسيع البحث), complement 5a (توسيع البحث), complement c3 (توسيع البحث)
elements cc3d » elements crcy (توسيع البحث), elements ices (توسيع البحث), elements uce (توسيع البحث)
em algorithm » new algorithm (توسيع البحث), _ algorithm (توسيع البحث), ii algorithm (توسيع البحث)
level coding » level according (توسيع البحث), level modeling (توسيع البحث), level using (توسيع البحث)
-
181
Line chart of frame rate.
منشور في 2025"…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …"
-
182
The total loss and three-component loss.
منشور في 2025"…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …"
-
183
Improved upsampling module based on Transformer.
منشور في 2025"…On the KITTI dataset, our algorithm achieved 3D average detection accuracy (AP3D) of 81.15%, 62.02%, and 58.68% across three difficulty levels. …"
-
184
-
185
-
186
-
187
-
188
-
189
-
190
-
191
Overall framework design.
منشور في 2025"…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …"
-
192
Gamma distribution of reuse.
منشور في 2025"…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …"
-
193
Top 5 correlated features based on reuse.
منشور في 2025"…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …"
-
194
Features with the top importance score.
منشور في 2025"…Our approach uses cross-project code clone detection to establish the ground truth for software reuse, identifying code clones across popular GitHub projects as indicators of potential reuse candidates. …"
-
195
-
196
S1 Graphical abstract -
منشور في 2025"…The software uses a shape-detection algorithm to single out and track the movement of pillars’ tips for the most common shapes of EHT platforms. …"
-
197
Quantitative results on WEDU dataset.
منشور في 2024"…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …"
-
198
Counting results on DRPD dataset.
منشور في 2024"…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …"
-
199
Quantitative results on RFRB dataset.
منشور في 2024"…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …"
-
200
Main module structure.
منشور في 2024"…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …"