Search alternatives:
method algorithm » network algorithm (Expand Search), means algorithm (Expand Search), mean algorithm (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
complement rast » complement past (Expand Search), complement 5a (Expand Search), complement rim4 (Expand Search)
rast algorithm » best algorithm (Expand Search), forest algorithm (Expand Search), based algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
method algorithm » network algorithm (Expand Search), means algorithm (Expand Search), mean algorithm (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
complement rast » complement past (Expand Search), complement 5a (Expand Search), complement rim4 (Expand Search)
rast algorithm » best algorithm (Expand Search), forest algorithm (Expand Search), based algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
-
481
Quantitative results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
482
Counting results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
483
Quantitative results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
484
Main module structure.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
485
Counting results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
486
Quantitative results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
487
Architecture of MAR-YOLOv9.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
488
Quantitative results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
489
Counting results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
490
Example images from four plant datasets.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
491
Counting results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
492
Detection visualization results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
493
-
494
Oscillatory Field Genesis: The Emergent Architecture of Spacetime, Matter, and Memory
Published 2025Subjects: -
495
<b>Force-Position-Speed Planning and Roughness rediction for Robotic Polishing</b>
Published 2025“…The improved dung beetle optimization algorithm, back propagation neural network, finite element analysis and response surface method provide a strong guarantee for the selection of robotic polishing process parameters. …”
-
496
High-Dimensional Variable Clustering based on Maxima of a Weakly Dependent Random Process
Published 2025“…A data-driven selection method for the tuning parameter is also proposed. …”
-
497
Data Sheet 1_Extraction of exact symbolic stationary probability formulas for Markov chains with finite space with application to production lines. Part I: description of methodolo...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>A general algorithm that commences with the Markov chain transition matrix as an input element and forms the state transition diagram. …”
-
498
Video 1_Extraction of exact symbolic stationary probability formulas for Markov chains with finite space with application to production lines. Part I: description of methodology.mp...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>A general algorithm that commences with the Markov chain transition matrix as an input element and forms the state transition diagram. …”
-
499
Multi-Task Learning for Gaussian Graphical Regressions with High Dimensional Covariates
Published 2024“…We also develop an efficient augmented Lagrangian algorithm for computation, which solves subproblems with a semi-smooth Newton method. …”
-
500
Practical implementation of an End-to-end methodology for SPC of 3-D part geometry: A case study
Published 2025“…The approach is based on monitoring the spectrum of the Laplace–Beltrami (LB) operator of each scanned part estimated using finite element methods (FEM). The spectrum of the LB operator is an intrinsic summary of the geometry of a part, independent of the ambient space. …”