Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
cases increased » rate increased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search)
ct largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
8 cases » _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search), 19 cases (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), via large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
cases increased » rate increased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search)
ct largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
8 cases » _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search), 19 cases (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), via large (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
The model develops larger place fields with shallower phase precession in areas of higher running speed.
Published 2023“…There is a tendency for a modest decrease as the mean of the distribution (dotted line) is below a ratio of 1. …”
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
<i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> C deep rough LPS mutants show increased susceptibility to chloramphenicol and gentamicin.
Published 2025“…<i>coli</i> C wild type is approximately 4 μg/ml for both antibiotics. Increased bacterial growth at sub-MIC antibiotic concentrations is observed in some cases; similar observations have been described previously [<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002952#pbio.3002952.ref035" target="_blank">35</a>–<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002952#pbio.3002952.ref038" target="_blank">38</a>]. …”
-
119
S8 Table -
Published 2023“…The most prominent included sex, where being a female associated with decreased odds of DR, while longer duration of diabetes and poor glycaemic control associated with increased odds. The duration of diabetes effect was partially, but significantly, mediated by age of diabetes diagnoses (8.6% of variance explained, p = 0.012). …”
-
120