Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
ct largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), via large (Expand Search)
c also » _ also (Expand Search), can also (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
ct largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), via large (Expand Search)
c also » _ also (Expand Search), can also (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
In superadditive networks, more enhancers decrease noise and fidelity.
Published 2023“…Meanwhile <i>d</i><sub>1</sub>, the rate of increase for <i>k</i><sub>on</sub>, was chosen to be 0.01 for both <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> (B) Unlike in the subadditive case, enhancer numbers decrease transcriptional fidelity and also decrease noise. …”
-
79
-
80