Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
c larger » _ larger (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
c cases » ic cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
c larger » _ larger (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
c cases » ic cases (Expand Search), _ cases (Expand Search), 3 cases (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
Fig 5 -
Published 2020“…<p>Observed and estimated case counts for (A) New York, (B) Florida, (C) Washington, (D) California, and (E) New Zealand. …”
-
173
Fig 3 -
Published 2020“…<p>(A) Observed and estimated case counts, (C) estimated prevalence, and posterior estimates for (B) <i>R</i><sub>0b</sub> and (D) fraction of normal contacts (<i>f</i><sub>2</sub>) among those distancing. …”
-
174
-
175
-
176
Ct values do not differ substantially by vaccine type.
Published 2022“…</b> The time analysis showed a decrease in N1 Ct values with time over 7 months. Combining all three vaccines, there was a significant decrease over the first 7 months, with a slope of -0.18 (95% CI: -0.26–0.10), p value <0.0001. …”
-
177
-
178
-
179
-
180