Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Comparison of the RMSD values for AlphaFold biomphalysin predictions.
Published 2025“…This observation can be an artifact of AlphaFold predictions or a structural rearrangement necessary for the activity. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Data collection timepoints.
Published 2024“…Assuming a 10% standard deviation for the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> value in the control group, no missing data, and crossover of 5% of patients, with the bilateral alpha risk set at 0.05, including 950 patients will provide 85% power for detecting a 2% between-group absolute difference in the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> value. …”
-
14
Details of the intervention.
Published 2024“…Assuming a 10% standard deviation for the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> value in the control group, no missing data, and crossover of 5% of patients, with the bilateral alpha risk set at 0.05, including 950 patients will provide 85% power for detecting a 2% between-group absolute difference in the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> value. …”
-
15
Patient flowchart.
Published 2024“…Assuming a 10% standard deviation for the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> value in the control group, no missing data, and crossover of 5% of patients, with the bilateral alpha risk set at 0.05, including 950 patients will provide 85% power for detecting a 2% between-group absolute difference in the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> value. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20