Search alternatives:
mapping algorithm » making algorithm (Expand Search), mining algorithm (Expand Search), learning algorithm (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
element mapping » elemental mapping (Expand Search), element modeling (Expand Search), argument mapping (Expand Search)
complement low » complement _ (Expand Search)
low algorithm » new algorithm (Expand Search), box algorithm (Expand Search), coa algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
mapping algorithm » making algorithm (Expand Search), mining algorithm (Expand Search), learning algorithm (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
element mapping » elemental mapping (Expand Search), element modeling (Expand Search), argument mapping (Expand Search)
complement low » complement _ (Expand Search)
low algorithm » new algorithm (Expand Search), box algorithm (Expand Search), coa algorithm (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
<b>The abundance of ground-level atmospheric ice-nucleating particles and aerosol properties </b><b>in the North Slope of Alaska</b>
Published 2024“…It is worth noting that we also flag the data based on wind speed and number concentration, and data mentor edits. The algorithm we use is described in this paper (Sheridan et al., 2016). …”
-
212
-
213
-
214
-
215
-
216
<b>BRISC: Annotated Dataset for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification</b>
Published 2025“…It provides high-quality, physician-validated pixel-level masks and a balanced multi-class classification split, suitable for benchmarking segmentation and classification algorithms as well as multi-task learning research.…”
-
217
-
218
Ablation study visualization results.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a self-constructed dataset demonstrate the improved model efficacy, achieving 92.0% precision, 80.8% recall, 87.0% mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5), and 81.79 FPS detection speed. Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
219
Experimental parameter configuration.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a self-constructed dataset demonstrate the improved model efficacy, achieving 92.0% precision, 80.8% recall, 87.0% mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5), and 81.79 FPS detection speed. Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
220
FLMP-YOLOv8 identification results.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a self-constructed dataset demonstrate the improved model efficacy, achieving 92.0% precision, 80.8% recall, 87.0% mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5), and 81.79 FPS detection speed. Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”