Search alternatives:
complement based » complement past (Expand Search), complement cascade (Expand Search), complement system (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
mean algorithm » means algorithm (Expand Search), new algorithm (Expand Search), each algorithm (Expand Search)
element mean » element mesh (Expand Search), latent mean (Expand Search), element te (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
complement based » complement past (Expand Search), complement cascade (Expand Search), complement system (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
mean algorithm » means algorithm (Expand Search), new algorithm (Expand Search), each algorithm (Expand Search)
element mean » element mesh (Expand Search), latent mean (Expand Search), element te (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
-
161
Ablation study visualization results.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
162
Experimental parameter configuration.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
163
FLMP-YOLOv8 identification results.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
164
C2f structure.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
165
Experimental environment configuration.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
166
Ablation experiment results table.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
167
YOLOv8 identification results.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
168
LSKA module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
169
Comparison of mAP curves in ablation experiments.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
170
FarsterBlock structure.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
171
Sample augmentation and annotation illustration.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
172
YOLOv8 model architecture diagram.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
173
FLMP-YOLOv8 architecture diagram.
Published 2025“…Compared to the original YOLOv8 model, the improved algorithm shows increases of 2.2% in precision, 0.6% in recall, and 2.0% in mAP@0.5, with a detection speed improvement of 65.48 FPS. …”
-
174
-
175
Description of data sources.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Objective</p><p>This paper introduces a novel framework for evaluating phenotype algorithms (PAs) using the open-source tool, Cohort Diagnostics.…”
-
176
-
177
-
178
High-Throughput Mass Spectral Library Searching of Small Molecules in R with NIST MSPepSearch
Published 2025“…Despite the availability of numerous library search algorithms, those developed by NIST and implemented in MS Search remain predominant, partly because commercial databases (e.g., NIST, Wiley) are distributed in proprietary formats inaccessible to custom code. …”
-
179
SpeLL: An Agent for Natural Language-Driven Intelligent Spectral Modeling
Published 2025“…The core strength of SpeLL lies in its dual RAG pathways. The Code RAG provides specialized code knowledge for spectral data analysis, enabling the LLM to generate robust and domain-specific analytical scripts that address the implementation and optimization of algorithms. …”
-
180
Various metrics of the training model.
Published 2025“…The proposed YOLOv8 model achieved a mean Average Precision (mAP@50) of 0.953, mAP@50–95 of 0.678, precision of 0.91, and recall of 0.88. …”