Search alternatives:
method algorithm » network algorithm (Expand Search), means algorithm (Expand Search), mean algorithm (Expand Search)
complement based » complement past (Expand Search), complement cascade (Expand Search), complement system (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
elements method » element method (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
method algorithm » network algorithm (Expand Search), means algorithm (Expand Search), mean algorithm (Expand Search)
complement based » complement past (Expand Search), complement cascade (Expand Search), complement system (Expand Search)
coding algorithm » cosine algorithm (Expand Search), modeling algorithm (Expand Search), finding algorithm (Expand Search)
elements method » element method (Expand Search)
level coding » level according (Expand Search), level modeling (Expand Search), level using (Expand Search)
-
521
Quantitative results on DRPD dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
522
Architecture of MAR-YOLOv9.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
523
Quantitative results on MTDC-UAV dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
524
Counting results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
525
Example images from four plant datasets.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
526
Counting results on RFRB dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
527
Detection visualization results on WEDU dataset.
Published 2024“…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
-
528
-
529
Structure of optimized model parameters in the high-dimensional cases.
Published 2025“…The number and size of the clusters were determined with help of the -means clustering method. Both were set to zero if the absolute mean value of the off-diagonal elements in the correlation matrix (cf. …”
-
530
Design of stiffened panels for stress and buckling via topology optimization: data
Published 2024“…To solve the optimization problem, a semi-analytical sensitivity analysis is performed, and the optimization algorithm is outlined. Numerical investigations demonstrate and validate the proposed method.…”
-
531
Data Sheet 1_Integrated diagnostics and time series sensitivity assessment for growth monitoring of a medicinal plant (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) based on unmanned aerial vehicl...
Published 2025“…PIs collectively achieved high-precision predictions (mean 0.42 ≤ R<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.94), with the prediction of PH using green leaf index (GLI) in BP algorithm attaining peak accuracy (R² = 0.94). VIs and PIs exhibited comparable predictive capacity for yield, with multi-indicators integrated modeling significantly enhancing performance: VIs achieved R² = 0.87 under RF algorithms, whereas PIs reached R² = 0.81 using BP algorithms. …”
-
532
Data Sheet 2_Integrated diagnostics and time series sensitivity assessment for growth monitoring of a medicinal plant (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) based on unmanned aerial vehicl...
Published 2025“…PIs collectively achieved high-precision predictions (mean 0.42 ≤ R<sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.94), with the prediction of PH using green leaf index (GLI) in BP algorithm attaining peak accuracy (R² = 0.94). VIs and PIs exhibited comparable predictive capacity for yield, with multi-indicators integrated modeling significantly enhancing performance: VIs achieved R² = 0.87 under RF algorithms, whereas PIs reached R² = 0.81 using BP algorithms. …”
-
533
Methodological overview.
Published 2025“…<p>(A) The source reconstruction of TMS-evoked potential of each subject was performed using dSPM method based on MNE software library. The time series of cortical activity were extracted through Schaefer 200 parcellation atlas. …”
-
534
Mean squared Error on all unseen data.
Published 2025“…The first extension we consider is the case of graph signals that have only been partially recorded, meaning a subset of their elements is missing at observation time. Next, we examine the statistical effect of correlated prediction error and propose a method for Generalized Least Squares (GLS) on graphs. …”
-
535
Possible graph filter functions.
Published 2025“…The first extension we consider is the case of graph signals that have only been partially recorded, meaning a subset of their elements is missing at observation time. Next, we examine the statistical effect of correlated prediction error and propose a method for Generalized Least Squares (GLS) on graphs. …”
-
536
The notational conventions used in this paper.
Published 2025“…The first extension we consider is the case of graph signals that have only been partially recorded, meaning a subset of their elements is missing at observation time. Next, we examine the statistical effect of correlated prediction error and propose a method for Generalized Least Squares (GLS) on graphs. …”
-
537
Video 1_TDE-3: an improved prior for optical flow computation in spiking neural networks.mp4
Published 2025“…Proposed in the literature bioinspired neuromorphic Time-Difference Encoder (TDE-2) combines event-based sensors and processors with spiking neural networks to provide real-time and energy-efficient motion detection through extracting temporal correlations between two points in space. However, on the algorithmic level, this design leads to a loss of direction-selectivity of individual TDEs in textured environments. …”
-
538
Data Sheet 1_TDE-3: an improved prior for optical flow computation in spiking neural networks.pdf
Published 2025“…Proposed in the literature bioinspired neuromorphic Time-Difference Encoder (TDE-2) combines event-based sensors and processors with spiking neural networks to provide real-time and energy-efficient motion detection through extracting temporal correlations between two points in space. However, on the algorithmic level, this design leads to a loss of direction-selectivity of individual TDEs in textured environments. …”
-
539
Confusion_Matrix_Data.zip
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr">This research paper proposes a novel approach for human activity recognition using depth video data, focusing on improving accuracy by effectively capturing motion information and utilizing a robust classification method. Here's a breakdown of the key elements:</p><p dir="ltr"><b>. …”
-
540
supporting data for PHD thesis entitled " Arousal Regulation and Neurofeedback Treatment for ADHD Children"
Published 2025“…Analyses use standardized mean differences (Hedges g) under random-effects models, stratified by comparator type (medicine, active, sham, passive) and, where applicable, contrasted across protocol families (customised algorithm, SCP, SMR, TBR).</p><p dir="ltr">The supporting dataset contains the <b>raw arm-level descriptive statistics</b> required to compute effect sizes: per study, outcome, and timepoint it lists group means, standard deviations, and sample sizes for neurofeedback and control arms, along with rater, comparator category, protocol type, and outcome direction coding (so higher values consistently reflect the intended construct). …”