بدائل البحث:
larger decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
ct levels » c levels (توسيع البحث), wt levels (توسيع البحث), cd levels (توسيع البحث)
i larger » _ larger (توسيع البحث), i large (توسيع البحث), _ large (توسيع البحث)
c larger » _ larger (توسيع البحث), c large (توسيع البحث), _ large (توسيع البحث)
a large » _ large (توسيع البحث)
larger decrease » marked decrease (توسيع البحث)
ct levels » c levels (توسيع البحث), wt levels (توسيع البحث), cd levels (توسيع البحث)
i larger » _ larger (توسيع البحث), i large (توسيع البحث), _ large (توسيع البحث)
c larger » _ larger (توسيع البحث), c large (توسيع البحث), _ large (توسيع البحث)
a large » _ large (توسيع البحث)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
Performance of the response detection algorithm at detecting simulated increases versus decreases in firing rate.
منشور في 2020"…That bias disappeared for larger response sizes (>100% of baseline). Box plots show the distributions of response in our recorded data plotted separately for increases and decreases for each cell type. …"
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
S1 File -
منشور في 2023"…BSRs for mesopic (mean±SD: 1.50±0.21) and photopic (1.60±0.24) stimuli were greater than unity (p<0.001), with the latter showing larger estimates than former (p<0.001). …"
-
89
-
90
Table_1_Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks.DOCX
منشور في 2021"…We examined the relationship between phenotypic clumping and flock richness using four variables—body size, foraging behavior, foraging height and taxonomic relatedness. Using a null model approach, we found that small flocks were more phenotypically clumped for body size than expected by chance; however, phenotypic clumping decreased as flocks increased in size and approached expected phenotypic variation in large flocks. …"
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
DataSheet1_Knockdown of Ift88 in fibroblasts causes extracellular matrix remodeling and decreases conduction velocity in cardiomyocyte monolayers.docx
منشور في 2022"…The fraction of sites with interelectrode activation block was larger in the siIft88 group than in the siNC group (6.59 × 10<sup>−2</sup> ± 8.01 × 10<sup>−2</sup> vs. 1.18 × 10<sup>−2</sup> ± 3.72 × 10<sup>−2</sup> respectively, p < 0.05). …"
-
100