Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
dalys increased » values increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), cases increased (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), via large (Expand Search)
_ dalys » _ days (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
dalys increased » values increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), cases increased (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), via large (Expand Search)
_ dalys » _ days (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Geographical distribution of large cities and small cities.
Published 2024“…The Figure reveals two patterns: 1) the maximum level of innovation is higher in large cities (2.53) than in small cities (2.02); 2) among large cities in <b>a</b>, innovation levels in general decrease with nightlight density. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
<i>FVC</i> change of southern observation line.
Published 2024“…The Open-pit mining affected areas showed the largest decline, reaching 68.3%. The <i>FVC</i> in the underground mining areas had a downward trend, but self-healing effect after mining was also observed. (2) The overall <i>FVC</i> in the study area was positively correlated with the number of precipitation days. (3) There were differences in the sensitivity to mining disturbance for different landform in the underground mining areas. (4) Although the <i>FVC</i> in the Old mining areas had recovered to the level of Natural growth control area, but the annual fluctuation was larger, which might mean lower ecological stability.…”
-
16
<i>FVC</i> change of the northern observation line.
Published 2024“…The Open-pit mining affected areas showed the largest decline, reaching 68.3%. The <i>FVC</i> in the underground mining areas had a downward trend, but self-healing effect after mining was also observed. (2) The overall <i>FVC</i> in the study area was positively correlated with the number of precipitation days. (3) There were differences in the sensitivity to mining disturbance for different landform in the underground mining areas. (4) Although the <i>FVC</i> in the Old mining areas had recovered to the level of Natural growth control area, but the annual fluctuation was larger, which might mean lower ecological stability.…”
-
17
Time series change of <i>FVC</i> in each analysis area.
Published 2024“…The Open-pit mining affected areas showed the largest decline, reaching 68.3%. The <i>FVC</i> in the underground mining areas had a downward trend, but self-healing effect after mining was also observed. (2) The overall <i>FVC</i> in the study area was positively correlated with the number of precipitation days. (3) There were differences in the sensitivity to mining disturbance for different landform in the underground mining areas. (4) Although the <i>FVC</i> in the Old mining areas had recovered to the level of Natural growth control area, but the annual fluctuation was larger, which might mean lower ecological stability.…”
-
18
Annual change rate of <i>FVC</i> in each analysis area.
Published 2024“…The Open-pit mining affected areas showed the largest decline, reaching 68.3%. The <i>FVC</i> in the underground mining areas had a downward trend, but self-healing effect after mining was also observed. (2) The overall <i>FVC</i> in the study area was positively correlated with the number of precipitation days. (3) There were differences in the sensitivity to mining disturbance for different landform in the underground mining areas. (4) Although the <i>FVC</i> in the Old mining areas had recovered to the level of Natural growth control area, but the annual fluctuation was larger, which might mean lower ecological stability.…”
-
19
-
20