Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
_ larger » _ large (Expand Search), _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
_ larger » _ large (Expand Search), _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Epithelial cell-size dysregulation is also found in mouse tumors and may proceed with loss of tissue organization and upregulation of transcription.
Published 2022“…Stage II involves more mixed stroma/tumor regions and disorganization, leading to sparse cells and increased cell size dysregulation. Late stage (III-IV) cancers are dominated by adaptation towards maximal cell division rate, evolution of immune resistance, and also loss of cytokeratin staining. …”
-
4
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…(B) Even though higher proportions of mutualism promote higher richness, introducing this type of interaction into already assembled large communities promotes a sudden drop in richness, while stopping mutualism promotes a slight boost in richness increase. (C) Mutualism also promotes an increase in network connectance when introduced into assembled communities, while stopping mutualistic interactions from entering an assembled system slowly decreases it. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Effect of parameter <i>a</i> on the model equations by increasing and decreasing value of <i>a</i> to 25%.
Published 2022“…<p><b>(a)</b> By increasing the value ‘<i>a</i>’ from 0.107 to 0.134. <b>(b)</b> By decreasing the value ‘<i>a</i>’ from 0.107 to 0.08.…”
-
8
-
9
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”
-
10
The robson classification system, also known as the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS).
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20