Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search)
c largest » _ largest (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search)
c largest » _ largest (Expand Search), c large (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
Study 1_EFA.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
Raw data.
Published 2025“…The participants were divided into low and high groups for RC, and the RC-to-cholesterol ratio was based on the median values. Vertebral fractures were assessed via the Genant semiquantitative classification system on CT-reconstructed sagittal images.…”
-
171
Baseline characteristics of the subjects.
Published 2025“…The participants were divided into low and high groups for RC, and the RC-to-cholesterol ratio was based on the median values. Vertebral fractures were assessed via the Genant semiquantitative classification system on CT-reconstructed sagittal images.…”
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
-
177
-
178
-
179
Study 2_Experiment 1.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
180
Study 1_CFA2.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”