Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Example of predicted effects of choice bundling on preference for larger, later rewards (LLRs) over smaller, sooner rewards (SSRs).
Published 2021“…The corresponding graph to the right illustrates how the discounted value (<i>V</i>) of the LLR decreases hyperbolically according to <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0259830#pone.0259830.e001" target="_blank">Eq 1</a> (in this example, <i>k</i> = 0.003). …”
-
8
Largest twenty coefficients by absolute value as defined by logistic regression.
Published 2022“…Negative values signify that as the variable decreases, the risk of requiring invasive ventilation decreases. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs....
Published 2025“…<p>TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Structure stabilizes larger numbers of species, but increasing competitive asymmetry increases species loss.
Published 2021“…<b>(B)</b> Comparing identical conditions between two different system sizes (<i>L</i> = 100 and <i>L</i> = 200), the effects of disorder are relatively small in comparison to the effects of system size, with smaller system sizes (blue lines) showing a significant amplification of reduction in survival probability as compared to the larger system. …”
-
20