Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
score values » curve values (Expand Search)
via larger » via large (Expand Search), via laser (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
score values » curve values (Expand Search)
via larger » via large (Expand Search), via laser (Expand Search)
i values » _ values (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
6
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Study 1_CFA1.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
14
Study 1_EFA.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
15
-
16
Study 2_Experiment 1.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
17
Study 1_CFA2.
Published 2025“…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
-
18
-
19
CAM and CAM-MYCS scores stratified by lifestyle and health behavior factors.
Published 2025Subjects: -
20