Showing 1 - 20 results of 5,624 for search '(((( learning based decrease ) OR ( _ largest decrease ))) OR ( i values decrease ))', query time: 0.58s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Table of values for <i>p.</i> by Long Di (9977453)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, a probabilistic obstacle motion prediction framework is established through motion pattern analysis to actively optimize the robot’s motion strategy and reduce tracking errors. Simulation-based experimental results demonstrate that, under complex obstacle motion scenarios, the proposed method achieves a 55.8% reduction in trajectory tracking error compared with recently proposed improved APF methods and a 41.5% decrease relative to Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMP) baselines. …”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs.... by Brent J. Bellinger (21156150)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs. …”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Moran’s I value, Z value and P value of CCD-GFEE. by Dalai Ma (17847101)

    Published 2025
    “…Within them, the CCD of Chengdu is the highest, Chongqing has achieved the largest stage leap. (4) The global Moran’s I consistently remained positive and exhibited a tendency of initially rising and subsequently falling, indicating that the spatial aggregation effect of CCD-GFEE first increased and then decreased. (5) The CCD-GFEE driving factors are examined using the spatial econometric model, and it has been observed that the impact of population size and government intervention on CCD-GFEE is negative, while the impact of industrial structure, technological progress and economic level on the coupling and coordination of CCD-GFEE is positive. …”
  20. 20